Often when old people in their late 90s and above are asked on TV what they secret to their longevity is, they would often allude to a range of things from laughter to healthy eating. Inasmuch as those interviews are aspirational, is it up to humans to determine (to some extent) how long we live just by eating healthily and exercising? Or does longevity have more to do with one’s genes?
Discover our latest podcast
Genes or gym?
Scientists have for centuries been searching for the answer to this question. A team of researchers set out to find out if genetics or physical activity is what determines a person’s life span. The findings, published in the Journal of Ageing and Physical Activity shows that people who may have the benefit of ‘good’ genes, were still susceptible to chronic diseases if they are not physically active, according to Health Digest.
On the other hand, even if you are not genetically privileged to live long, you can adjust that in your favour through regular physical activities. Aladdin H. Shadyab, Ph.D., senior author of the study said:
Our study showed that, even if you aren't likely to live long based on your genes, you can still extend your lifespan by engaging in positive lifestyle behaviours such as regular exercise and sitting less
Research impacts
As the average lifespan of people continue to increase in many countries, it is necessary to encourage more people to engage in some form of physical activity or the other, according to MBG Movement.
Thus, the study goes to support the need for people to engage in lower intensity activities at the least to ensure overall well-being and a long and healthy life.
Sources used:
Health Digest: Do Genetics Or Physical Activity Play A Bigger Role In Longevity?
MindBodyGreen Movement:Daily Movement May Be More Significant For Longevity Than Genetics, Says New Study
UC San Diego Today:Physical Activity May Have a Stronger Role than Genes in Longevity
Read more:
⋙ According to this study, your love of animals is written in your genes
⋙ Genetic Abnormality: This Mother Had Given Birth To 44 Children By The Time She Was In Her Late 30s
